Vice Presidential Address: Speaking to Religious Hybridity
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.70927/vkzegs41Keywords:
interreligious engagement; religious plurality; hybridity; multiple religious practiceAbstract
This address considers the ways in which members of the academy might respond to the rise of religious hybridity among our member traditions, both contributing our expertise to the analysis of the phenomenon and taking account of this hybridity in our practices.
References
James Farwell, “On Whether Christians Should Participate in Buddhist Practice: A Critical Autobiographical Reflection,” in Interreligious Studies and Intercultural Theology 1.2 (2017), 242-256.
Peniel Jesudason Rufus Rajkumar and Joseph Prabhakar Dayam, eds., Many Yet One?: Multiple Religious Belonging (Geneva: World Council of Churches 2016).
Ross Kane, Syncretism and Christian Tradition: Race and Revelation in the Study of Religious Mixture (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2020).
Robert S. Heaney, “Public Theology and Public Missiology,” in Anglican Theological Review 102.2 (Spring 2020), 201-212. See also Farwell, op cit., 248-250.
https://onbeing.org/blog/the-mysterious-junction-of-suffering-and-love/
Norman Fischer, Opening to You: Zen-Inspired Translations of the Psalms (New York: Penguin Compass, 2003).
SimonMary Aihiokai, “Making Way for Comparative Theology in the Liturgy of the Word: In Dialogue with James L. Fredericks,” Journal of Ecumenical Studies 53:4 (Fall 2018), 499-519.
Perry Schmidt-Leukel, Religious Pluralism and Interreligious Theology: The Gifford Lectures (Maryknoll: Orbis, 2017).
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 James Farwell (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
